For the Quarter Ending September 2025
North America
• In the USA, the Calcium Silicate Price Index increased quarter-over-quarter, driven by import disruptions.
• Calcium Silicate Spot Price fluctuated as Asian and other regional suppliers offers undercut the market.
• Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook stayed weak, with residential construction slowdown curbing consistent uptake and price support.
• Calcium Silicate Price Index saw temporary upticks, though buyers stayed cautious amid sufficient inventories.
• Port congestion at Asian ports delayed deliveries, tightening supply and increasing prices in the region.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in September 2025 in the North America?
• Ongoing port congestion at Asian ports delayed imports, reducing supply and extending procurement lead times.
• Rising freight and logistics costs increased production and sourcing expenses, supporting recent price gains.
• Weak construction activity and restrained buyer purchasing limited demand, capping broader price increases this quarter.
APAC
• In China, the Calcium Silicate Price Index fell by 2.63% quarter-over-quarter, reflecting surplus supply conditions.
• The average Calcium Silicate price for the quarter was approximately USD 308.33/MT, reflecting subdued trading sentiment.
• Calcium Silicate Spot Price weakened amid elevated inventories, pressured by port congestion and domestic offtake.
• Calcium Silicate Price Forecast shows recovery potential as weather improvements support construction restocking and exports.
• Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend softened as calcium hydroxide and silica eased, limiting producers' margins.
• Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook remains subdued with construction weakness counterbalancing automobile sector support and cautious buying.
• Calcium Silicate Price Index fluctuations mirrored inventory builds and export demand amid logistical disruptions, seasonality.
Major producers run-rate reductions during floods tightened regional supply temporarily, supporting short-term Price Index rebounds.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in September 2025 in APAC?
• Persistent oversupply from high operating rates pressured prices, despite stable exports and weak domestic offtake.
• Declining feedstock costs reduced production expense support, constraining sellers' ability to lift offers meaningfully promptly.
• Severe weather and port congestion disrupted shipments, reducing immediate demand and elevating on-site inventories thereby.
Europe
• In Germany, the Calcium Silicate Price Index rose by 1.8575% quarter-over-quarter, driven by import disruptions.
• The average Calcium Silicate price for the quarter was approximately USD 548.33/MT, CFR Hamburg assessment.
• Calcium Silicate Spot Price remained volatile as Asian offers undercut Europe, while ports experienced delays.
• Calcium Silicate Price Forecast indicates modest near-term gains as delayed shipments clear and restocking starts.
• Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend increased due to higher freight and procurement expenses, pressuring margins.
• Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook remained weak, residential construction contraction limiting sustained offtake and price support.
• Calcium Silicate Price Index showed brief upticks, yet buyers remained cautious as inventories stayed adequate.
• Port strikes, inland water levels and rail disruptions sustained bottlenecks, elevating procurement costs and volatility.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in September 2025 in Europe?
• Persistent Northern European port congestion and strikes delayed imports, tightening supply and increasing procurement times.
• Higher freight and logistics costs raised production and procurement expenses, supporting net price increases recently.
• Subdued construction activity and cautious buyer procurement limited offtake, preventing larger price appreciation this quarter.
For the Quarter Ending June 2025
North America
• The Calcium Silicate Price in North America increased quarter-over-quarter in Q2 2025, contributing to a firming in the Price Index.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend rose due to higher energy rates, increased labor expenses, and tariff-driven inflation on imported inputs.
• Domestic supply remained limited as manufacturers operated with lean inventories and prioritized exports, amid logistical delays and restricted port throughput.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook remained uneven, with stable demand from industrial insulation and fireproofing applications, while construction activity remained subdued due to cost inflation and delayed project starts.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in July 2025 in North America?
• Calcium Silicate Spot Prices increased in July 2025, driven by continued supply-side tightness and elevated input costs, despite relatively soft end-user demand.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend continued to rise due to inflation in silicate feedstock pricing and higher power and labor costs.
• The Calcium Silicate Price Forecast remains steady for the upcoming quarter, supported by consistent demand from thermal insulation and infrastructure applications.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook is cautiously optimistic, with industrial sectors helping to offset persistent weakness in commercial and residential construction procurement.
EUROPE
• The Calcium Silicate Price in Europe rose by 4% quarter-over-quarter in Q2 2025, as reflected in the upward trend of the Price Index.
• Price gains were primarily cost-driven, amid persistently high import costs, supply chain disruptions, and constrained port operations across key Northern European hubs.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend increased due to elevated freight charges, rising feedstock prices, and inflationary pressures across the Eurozone.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook remained weak overall, with continued sluggishness in the residential and commercial construction sectors, though civil engineering showed signs of stabilizing.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in July 2025 in Europe?
• In July 2025, the Calcium Silicate Spot Price increased due to ongoing port congestion and rail strikes across Northern Europe, which restricted material availability and prolonged lead times.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend remained upward, driven by elevated procurement costs from both regional and Asian suppliers, and persistent logistical bottlenecks.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook continued to underperform in housing and commercial sectors, though infrastructure-related offtake showed relative resilience.
• The Calcium Silicate Price Forecast suggests continued cost-push inflation in the near term, even as underlying demand remains subdued.
ASIA
• The Calcium Silicate Price in China fell by 5% quarter-over-quarter in Q2 2025, reflecting persistent market oversupply and subdued downstream demand.
• Despite marginal improvement in the construction sector, frequent weather disruptions and sluggish infrastructure activity weighed heavily on overall consumption.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend remained relatively stable but failed to offset the impact of sustained supply surpluses and weak offtake from core industries.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook stayed bearish amid restrained project starts, flooding-related construction delays, and cautious procurement behavior across key sectors.
Why did the price of Calcium Silicate change in July 2025 in Asia?
• The Calcium Silicate Spot Price decreased in July 2025 due to continued oversupply, soft construction activity, and seasonal disruptions affecting material demand.
• The Calcium Silicate Production Cost Trend showed no significant movement, as energy and labor inputs remained stable while capacity utilization stayed high.
• The Calcium Silicate Demand Outlook was hindered by flooding in southern provinces and post-holiday demand stagnation in consumer-linked segments like transport and retail.
• The Calcium Silicate Price Forecast remains weak unless a sharper recovery in infrastructure and export activity materializes to balance surplus stock.
For the Quarter Ending March 2025
North America
In Q1 2025, the U.S. Calcium Silicate market experienced a mixed trend, with early price increases driven by tight supply conditions, strong demand from the construction industry, and procurement activity ahead of anticipated import tariffs. Severe weather events and port congestion further disrupted supply chains, pushing up costs. Contractors rushed to purchase materials in anticipation of price hikes, creating temporary demand imbalances and boosting short-term market activity.
Despite inflationary pressures and higher borrowing costs, the market remained relatively stable, supported by steady infrastructure activity and consistent manufacturing output. These factors helped buffer the market from broader economic challenges, ensuring some resilience throughout the quarter. The construction sector, particularly residential development, remained a key driver of demand for insulation and fireproofing materials, further stabilizing the market.
By March, prices began to stabilize as domestic production improved, and supply chains adjusted. However, ongoing trade policy uncertainty and concerns about the long-term impacts of tariffs continued to weigh on market sentiment. Despite a stable overall outlook, market participants navigated a cautious environment, characterized by shifting regulations and a delicate balance between supply and demand.
APAC
In Q1 2025, the Calcium Silicate market in the APAC region showed signs of recovery after a sharp decline in Q4 2024. January began with stable pricing, supported by moderate demand, especially from downstream industries such as construction, ceramics, and glass, along with tight supply ahead of the Spring Festival. In February, prices dipped marginally by 1.5% as production increased post-holiday, outpacing consumption amid ongoing economic uncertainties and weak domestic spending. March saw price stabilization as improved manufacturing activity, seasonal infrastructure momentum, and policy support bolstered demand across key downstream sectors. The construction industry maintained moderate consumption levels. However, market sentiment remained cautious due to concerns over global supply chain disruptions following China’s new tariffs on U.S. imports. By the end of March 2025, Calcium Silicate FOB Qingdao (China) prices held steady, but the market recorded a 27% decline for the quarter compared to Q4 2024, reflecting a quarter marked by initial firmness, a brief dip, and eventual stabilization across core consuming industries.
Europe
In Q1 2025, the European Calcium Silicate market experienced mixed pricing trends, influenced by supply constraints and moderate recovery in downstream industries. January recorded a price increase, driven by limited supply, rising production costs, and the depreciating euro, which raised import expenses. Severe winter conditions disrupted transport networks in northern Europe, adding logistical costs and tightening availability. In February, prices surged despite weak demand from the construction sector, as reduced manufacturing output and expensive imports kept supply tight. The construction industry, a key consumer of Calcium Silicate for insulation and fireproofing, remained under pressure due to inflation and limited new project activity, although policy-driven infrastructure initiatives offered some support. In March, market conditions showed signs of stabilizing with balanced supply and moderate demand, aided by slight improvements in Germany’s residential construction sector and reduced order cancellations. Demand from downstream industries such as ceramics, glass, and industrial coatings remained subdued, but consistent supply limitations-maintained price levels. Calcium Silicate CFR Hamburg (Germany) prices remained stable in March 2025, capping a quarter that ended with an overall price decline of 11% compared to Q4 2024, reflecting the complex interplay of inflationary pressures, uncertain demand, and constrained supply.
For the Quarter Ending December 2024
North America
In Q4 2024, the U.S. Calcium Silicate market experienced a significant decline, primarily driven by weak domestic demand and a sluggish construction sector. The challenging economic environment, marked by rising interest rates, reduced commercial property values, and a tight lending landscape, significantly impacted market performance. Despite a modest recovery in the residential construction sector, factors such as labor shortages, high material costs, and limited land availability persisted, hindering growth.
Geopolitical uncertainties, particularly surrounding the U.S. Presidential Election and the threat of potential tariffs, further dampened market sentiment. Alongside these demand-side challenges, the market faced logistical disruptions, including port congestion and labor unrest, which exacerbated supply chain bottlenecks. The abundant supply of Calcium Silicate, combined with weak demand across critical industries such as construction, put downward pressure on prices.
By December, seasonal slowdowns and persistent economic challenges in the construction sector further weakened demand, leading to a substantial reduction in Calcium Silicate prices. Overall, the market struggled to recover, reflecting continued pressures from weak demand and logistical issues.
APAC
In Q4 2024, the APAC region witnessed a sharp decline in Calcium Silicate prices, driven by a combination of weak demand and excess supply across key markets. Economic challenges and reduced investment in the construction sector, a primary consumer of Calcium Silicate, significantly impacted domestic consumption. Export demand also declined due to sluggish economic activity in Europe and North America, further pressuring market dynamics. Seasonal factors led to an oversupplied market, which exacerbated the downward pressure on prices. Logistical challenges, including persistent port congestion, disrupted supply chains, contributing to inefficiencies and market imbalances. Downstream industries such as ceramics and glass, which rely heavily on Calcium Silicate, scaled back production amidst soaring energy costs and declining export orders, compounding the challenges. The overall price drop in the region during the quarter was significant, with an average decline of 38% compared to the previous quarter. Among the major markets, the most pronounced drop was observed in China. By December 2024, Calcium Silicate prices in the region continued to face headwinds, driven by oversupply, subdued demand, and lingering market uncertainties. Calcium Silicate FOB Qingdao (China) prices fell to USD 330/MT by the end of the year, underscoring the prevailing bearish sentiment in the APAC region.
Europe
In Q4 2024, the European Calcium Silicate market experienced a substantial decline in prices, largely due to weak demand from critical sectors such as construction. Geopolitical tensions, persistent supply chain disruptions, and ongoing port congestion further exacerbated market challenges. Rising energy and labor costs, elevated interest rates, and reduced investment in infrastructure and new projects added to the downward pressure on prices. Although steady imports and relatively efficient port operations ensured sufficient product availability, consumer confidence remained low, and market participants adopted a cautious approach throughout the quarter. Inflation within the Eurozone, which reached 2.4% in December, further dampened market sentiment, and restrained overall consumption. Germany, a significant market within the region, faced the steepest price declines, driven by ongoing economic challenges and reduced activity across residential, commercial, and civil engineering sectors. Weak demand from these key areas further compounded the downward trend in pricing. By the close of the quarter, Calcium Silicate prices in Europe had plummeted by 25% compared to the previous quarter. Prices for Calcium Silicate CFR Hamburg (Germany) fell to USD 498/MT, reflecting the challenges faced by the market. The combination of subdued demand, economic uncertainty, and supply chain difficulties highlighted the fragile state of the market and created a challenging environment for industry stakeholders.
