DEP Launches Investigation into Chemical Leak at GAC Plant in Searsport

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) swung into swift action when alerted to a chemical spill incident at the GAC Chemical Corporation earlier this week. As the situation continues to be under investigation, regulatory authorities are diligently working to fathom the entire scope and ramifications of this unsettling occurrence.

David Madore, the Deputy Commissioner of the DEP, shed some light on the nature of the chemical spill, describing it as involving a "very small amount of a polystyrene component." This initial revelation offers a glimpse into the substance involved and hints at the potential consequences it may entail.

The reported spill, it has been learned, transpired on Friday, September 22, triggering a rapid and coordinated response from the DEP's Hazardous Materials (Haz Mat) team. These specialized responders have remained on the scene throughout the week, meticulously evaluating the situation and implementing necessary measures to mitigate any adverse effects. As of September 26, the Haz Mat team has concluded that no further intervention from their side is warranted. This indicates that the immediate response phase has been effectively executed, and the situation is now in a managed state.

The GAC Chemical Corporation, an entity that is proudly employee-owned, is strategically nestled on a sprawling 152-acre expanse located on Kidder Point in Searsport, a city situated advantageously at the head of Penobscot Bay. The core activities of this company primarily revolve around the manufacturing and distribution of an extensive spectrum of industrial, specialty, and fine inorganic and organic chemicals. These chemicals serve diverse sectors, including paper mills, power plants, agriculture, and wastewater treatment plants. Among the illustrious products in GAC's portfolio are ammonium sulfate, sodium aluminate, aqua ammonia, liquid urea, polyvinyl alcohol, hollow sphere plastic pigment, and coatings. Nevertheless, it has not been definitively ascertained whether the chemical component involved in this incident found its way into the ocean or if it was confined to the facility's premises.

In anticipation of the investigation's unfolding, stakeholders are eagerly awaiting the results, which are expected to be divulged by the conclusion of the current week. The GAC Chemical Corporation has opted not to issue an official response or comment concerning the incident at this juncture, leaving a multitude of questions unanswered.

Concurrently, the Searsport Code Enforcement Office, having been duly apprised of the incident, has chosen to refrain from making any public statements regarding the ongoing investigation. This approach underscores their commitment to maintaining a stance of discretion as the inquiry evolves, as it is prudent to await comprehensive findings before drawing definitive conclusions or making formal declarations.